How to Choose a Lawyer

How to Choose a Construction Defect Lawyer

The Voice of Colorado’s Homeowners

Sullan2, Sandgrund, Smith & Perczak, P.C.

Denver Construction Defect Lawyers

Become an Educated Consumer. You must become an educated consumer before choosing a lawyer. Do not accept, without confirmation, a lawyer's self-serving description of what he or she has done in the past. Be careful of exaggerated suggestions of what you might be able to obtain through suit.

A Lawyer Shouldn't Rush You Into a Lawsuit .  Absent exceptional circumstances, such as the possible running of a statute of limitations or other deadline, no lawyer should rush you to the courthouse steps and into a lawsuit. If you have not tried to work things out with your builder-developer, your lawyer should nearly always recommend that you, sometimes with the lawyer's assistance, try to work things out informally. If possible, and if it will not prejudice your legal rights, give the builder-developer the chance to do the right thing before you get involved in expensive, lengthy and emotionally-draining litigation. (Because the law now requires home owners and builders to engage in a mandatory “Notice of Claim” process before a construction defect suit is filed, you may, unfortunately, need to consult with an attorney regarding compliance with these laws.  If your home problems are serious and may lead to a lawsuit if not properly addressed by those responsible, our firm often will guide homeowners and homeowner associations through the Notice of Claim process for no charge.)

Hands-On Experience.  The lawyer should be experienced in dealing with the kinds of problems you face. You should find out the names of cases that your attorney has actually tried to a jury in Colorado, either individually or as part of a trial team, and who he or she represented in those lawsuits. Many people assume that simply because a lawyer says he or she is a "trial" attorney that this means that the lawyer has lots of trial experience.
 
Realistic Expectations. Be careful of lawyers who brag about the "exceptional" settlements they have obtained, and find out how many of these settlements occurred in Colorado. Most consumers are not given enough facts or do not have the experience to judge whether a particular dollar-amount settlement was a good or bad result, even when the settlement is in the hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars . Sometimes a lawyer may tout a large judgment he or she obtained, and even issue self-serving "press releases" about it , but not tell you that the judgment remains mostly unpaid because of the lawyer’s failure to properly investigate the availability of insurance coverage or the defendants’ financial capabilities. No one wants to become involved in a drawn-out lawsuit, go to trial, obtain a judgment, and end up holding an “empty bag,” unable to repair serious construction problems because there is no insurance money or assets to pay off the judgment. Unfortunately, sometimes a homeowner or homeowner association’s time and money is better spent trying to fix what they can afford to fix rather than chasing an uninsured or “empty shell” defendant through the legal system: your lawyer should have the courage to tell you this rather than recommend a lawsuit that is more likely to benefit the lawyer than the client.

References . A lawyer should be willing and able to provide you with references. Some lawyers ingratiate themselves with certain associations or trade organizations (such as consumer groups or property management associations) by making substantial monetary contributions to those groups. References by such organizations may be a useful tool, but they should not be your only tool. Another good source for references is a local attorney who has worked against the lawyer you are considering hiring, as well as the lawyer’s former clients.  If your homeowner association lawyer makes a referral, find out if they have any current, or have been promised any sort of, "fee-sharing" arrangement with the law firm to whom they have referred you -- such "fee-sharing" arrangements can create conflicts of interest that need to be explored.

Insurance Knowledge. Because many construction defects cases involve complex insurance coverage issues, it is necessary that your attorney have an excellent understanding of these issues. Previous experience suing insurance companies, familiarity with the insurance industry and its practices, and knowledge of the hyper-technical provisions of insurance policies, are needed for a lawyer to competently represent homeowners and homeowner associations in construction defect litigation.  Does the law firm you are interviewing have lawyers whose practice focuses on insurance issues? Do those lawyers have demonstrated expertise in insurance and construction defects law, as reflected in their writing articles and books for, and giving speeches or teaching continuing legal education classes to, fellow lawyers?

Interview More Than One Lawyer. You should interview more than one lawyer , no matter how impressed you may be with the first lawyer you meet or their website, or how highly recommended that lawyer may be. You should discuss what is expected of you as a client, how expensive, stressful and time-consuming any proposed litigation may be, and what fee arrangements are available.

"Plan B" Settlement Experience.  Homeowner associations and individual home owners should try work out problems with builders and developers. The lawyer you hire should be experienced with what is sometimes referred to as "Plan B" settlements, which typically involve round-table meetings of construction professionals in an effort to develop a reasonable repair plan to be funded by those responsible for creating construction problems.  Your lawyers should demonstrate sufficient construction knowledge so that, in close consultation with your construction advisors, they can try to help ensure that the "Plan B" process is not misused to make "band-aid" repairs that may come back to haunt the owner years later. 

Accessability.  Most construction defect cases are fairly complex, and often require a team of legal professionals and independent experts to supply the necesssary legal and litigation support services.  It may be unreasonable to expect any, single law firm attorney to be involved in or familiar with every detail of a complicated case.  Often the trial of the lawsuit itself is a team effort. Because different courts sometimes schedule separate lawsuits being handled by the same law firm at the same time, and an attorney cannot be in two places at once, there can be no guarantee that the lawyer you were expecting to try your case will definitely do so. You should satisfy yourself that if the attorney who you are anticipating trying your case is unable to do so, that you have confidence in other law firm attorneys to do so.  Your phone calls and questions should be answered within a reasonable time, and you should be able to discuss your case and concerns directly with the lead, responsible attorney or attorneys without undue delay.

Suit Cost Advances. While lawyers are allowed to advance litigation costs on behalf of clients, and our law firm frequently does this, any lawyer who takes your case and tells you that you are under no legal obligation to repay those costs to his or her firm may be violating Colorado's ethics rules.  However, Colorado adopted a new ethics rule in 2008 which allows a law firm elect to receive repayment of costs contingent on the outcome of the lawsuit without the client having to personally reimburse those costs out of the client's pocket. Any lawyer who suggests that you not interview other lawyers, or says that if you do so he or she will not provide you legal services or falsely suggests he or she may be “booked up” by the time you make your decision, is suspect, and may be violating Colorado's ethics rules in making these statements.  Check with the firm's former clients: was the firm willing to make the necessary investment to properly prepare the case for effective settlement discussions and a powerful trial presentation, or did it attempt to work the case up "on the cheap?"  Most medium to large multi-family cases require many hundreds of thousands of dollars in expert witness investigation, testing and report writing expenses, as well as the expense of deposing the other sides' experts and other important witnesses.

Alternate Fee Arrangements. Explore alternate fee arrangements with your attorney, and choose the one that best fits your needs. Some law firms who work on a contingency fee basis, may also be available to work on an hourly rate or fixed fee basis.  However, no law firm is obligated to provide legal services on any case with which it chooses not to become involved for whatever reason.

Be Comfortable With and Confident in Your Lawyer.  In the end, you should satisfy yourself that your lawyer is smart, experienced, understanding, respected in the profession, and ethical, and that you are comfortable putting your trust in that person's hands.

Effective October 1, 2007, the firm name changed from Vanatta, Sullan, Sandgrund, Sullan and Smith, P.C. to Sullan2, Sandgrund, Smith & Perczak, P.C.  Mr. Sandgrund became "Of Counsel" then as well, and Ms. Mari Perczak joined the firm on that date and become a shareholder.


 
Serving home owners and homeowner associations in Metro Denver and on the Front Range, in the High Country and along the Western Slope of Colorado, including Denver, Colorado Springs, Boulder, Fort Collins, Littleton, Broomfield, Centennial, Grand Junction, Glenwood Springs, Brighton, Vail and Aspen and Jefferson, Douglas, Arapahoe, Boulder, Weld, Adams, Grand, Mesa, Mineral, Eagle, Garfield, Animas, Summit and El Paso counties.

Sullan2, Sandgrund, Smith & Perczak, P.C. - Construction Defect Litigation